The Meaning of Digital Literacy for Elementary School Teachers in Rural Chiang Mai

Authors

  • Nattapong Khamdee Chiang Mai University, Thailand
  • Siriporn Limsakul Chiang Mai University, Thailand

Keywords:

digital literacy, primary teachers, rural education, Chiang Mai, technology integration

Abstract

This study explores the meanings and experiences of digital literacy among primary school teachers in rural Chiang Mai, Thailand, where technological infrastructure and educational resources differ significantly from urban contexts. As digital technologies increasingly permeate educational practices globally, understanding how rural educators conceptualize and engage with digital literacy becomes crucial for equitable educational development. Through qualitative inquiry involving twenty primary school teachers from eight rural schools, this research examines teachers' perceptions of digital literacy, their self-assessed competencies, integration practices in classroom instruction, and challenges encountered in resource-limited environments. Findings reveal that rural teachers construct digital literacy meanings shaped by contextual constraints, viewing it simultaneously as an aspirational competency, a professional necessity, and a culturally mediated practice. While teachers recognize digital literacy's importance for student preparation and pedagogical innovation, implementation remains hindered by inadequate infrastructure, limited training opportunities, and tensions between traditional teaching values and technology integration. The study contributes nuanced understanding of digital literacy in marginalized educational contexts and recommends context-sensitive professional development, infrastructure investment, and policy frameworks acknowledging rural-urban digital divides in educational technology adoption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azano, A. P., & Stewart, T. T. (2015). Exploring place and practicing justice: Preparing pre-service teachers for success in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 30(9), 1–12.

Boonlue, K., & Charoenporn, P. (2018). Multicultural education in northern Thailand: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Development, 62, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.04.002

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108327554

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001

Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106.

Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley.

Janssen, J., Stoyanov, S., Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., Pannekeet, K., & Sloep, P. (2013). Experts' views on digital competence: Commonalities and differences. Computers & Education, 68, 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.008

Krumsvik, R. J. (2014). Teacher educators' digital competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(3), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.726273

Ibrahim, M. (2020). Psikologi Pendidikan: Suatu Stimulus Awal. In M. dan I. Rumalean (Ed.), Forsiladi Pers (Vol. 7, Issue 2). https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=WT-HEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR2&ots=orOGoJ4XaM&sig=_RldS7mWG5ZSpRE8sRmGX1Kt2Hs&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

M Muhsyanur, SY Sudikan, M. M. (2025). Linguistic Identity Negotiation on TikTok : Glocal Practices of Indonesian Content Creators. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 20(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v20i2.32574

Muhsyanur and Mustapha, B. (2023). Challenges and Strategies in Teaching Indonesian to Indonesian Occupied Students in Malaysia. TRICKS: Journal Ff Education And Learning Practices, 1(1), 32–39. https://journal.echaprogres.or.id/index.php/tricks/article/view/6

Muhsyanur, M. (2023a). The Bugis People’s Naming System in Bugis Ethnic Tradition. Journal of Language and Literature, 23(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v23i1.5062

Muhsyanur, M. (2023b). The Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning on Critical Thinking Skills in Indonesian Language Education. TRICKS: Journal of Education and Learning Practices, 1(3), 12–23. https://journal.echaprogres.or.id/index.php/tricks/article/view/36

Muhsyanur, M. (2025). Digital Literation: Dening Network-Based Hoaks Language in The News A Covid-19 Pandemic Discourse in Indonesia. INSPIRATION: Instructional Practices in Language Education, 4(1), 20–29. https://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/inspiration/article/view/25790

Muhsyanur, M., Suharti, S., & Sudikan, S. Y. (2022). Physical representation of female character in children’s novels by children. Diksi, 30(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v30i1.45663

Muhsyanur Muhsyanur, S. S. (2024). Implementation of Madrasah Literacy Program to Enhance Language Competence of Female Students at MTs As’ adiyah Putri Pusat Sengkang, Indonesia. Global Society and Knowledge Review, 2(6), 69–81.

Muhsyanur, Rahmatullah, A. S., Misnawati, Dumiyati, & Ghufron, S. (2021). The Effectiveness of “Facebook” As Indonesian Language Learning Media for Elementary School Student: Distance Learning Solutions in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Multicultural Education, 7(04), 38–47. https://www.mccaddogap.com/ojs/index.php/me/article/view/8%0Ahttps://www.mccaddogap.com/ojs/index.php/me/article/download/8/10

Torgerson, C. J. (2021). Systematic reviews in educational research. Bloomsbury Academic.

Nguyen, T. M., Hallinger, P., & Chen, C. W. (2020). Confucian values and school leadership in Vietnam: Exploring the influence of culture on principal decision making. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(1), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218759090

Phuwanatwichit, T. (2020). Digital divide and educational inequality in Thailand: Challenges for rural schools. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 6(2), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2020.62.220.228

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770

Street, B. V. (2003). What's "new" in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.

UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721

Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-30

How to Cite

Khamdee, N., & Limsakul, S. (2025). The Meaning of Digital Literacy for Elementary School Teachers in Rural Chiang Mai. TRICKS : Journal of Education and Learning Practices, 3(8), 10–21. Retrieved from https://journal.echaprogres.or.id/index.php/tricks/article/view/77

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.