Comparative Analysis of Basic Education Curricula in Türkiye and European Union Countries
Keywords:
Comparative education, Basic education curriculum, Türkiye, European Union, Curriculum development, Educational reform, Competency-based learning, Technology integration, Multicultural education, Curriculum implementationAbstract
This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of the basic education curricula in Türkiye and selected European Union (EU) countries. The research aims to identify similarities, differences, and areas for potential convergence or divergence in curricular approaches, content, and implementation strategies. Employing a qualitative multiple case study design, the study examines key curriculum documents, policy papers, and official reports from the respective ministries of education. Additionally, semi-structured interviews with educational stakeholders, including policymakers, curriculum developers, teachers, and experts, are conducted to capture diverse perspectives. The findings reveal both commonalities and significant differences in the overall guiding principles, subject matter prioritization, instructional methods, assessment strategies, and the integration of technology, multicultural perspectives, and moral/ethical values across the curricula. While shared goals, such as developing critical thinking and lifelong learning skills, are evident, the specific curricular approaches reflect the unique historical, cultural, and political contexts of each country or region. The study highlights the strong emphasis on competency-based learning and the development of core competencies in the Turkish curriculum, contrasting with the advanced technology integration strategies observed in certain EU countries. Additionally, the analysis reveals a greater emphasis on multicultural and inclusive education in some EU curricula, while the Turkish curriculum exhibits a more explicit integration of moral and ethical values rooted in Islamic traditions. The research identifies challenges related to teacher training, resource availability, and community engagement in curriculum implementation across both Turkish and EU contexts. The findings contribute to the broader discourse on curriculum development, educational reform, and the potential for cross-national learning and collaboration. The study underscores the importance of ongoing dialogue, knowledge-sharing, and collaborative efforts in shaping educational systems that are responsive to the diverse needs of learners and societies in an increasingly interconnected world.
Downloads
References
Altbach, P. G., & Kelly, G. P. (1986). New approaches to comparative education. University of Chicago Press.
American Educational Research Association. (2011). Code of ethics. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 145-156.
Banks, J. A. (2004). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 3-29). Jossey-Bass.
Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In R. Brown (Ed.), Knowledge, education, and cultural change (pp. 71-112). Tavistock.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bray, M., & Thomas, R. M. (1995). Levels of comparison in educational studies: Different insights from different literatures and the value of multilevel analyses. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 472-491. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.65.3.g3228437224v4877
British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). BERA. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
Cummings, W. K. (1999). The institutions of education: Compare, compare, compare! Comparative Education Review, 43(4), 413-437. https://doi.org/10.1086/447579
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill.
Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. The University of Chicago Press.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Eisner, E. W. (1994). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed.). Macmillan.
European Commission. (2018). The European qualifications framework (EQF). https://europa.eu/europass/en/european-qualifications-framework-eqf
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Goodlad, J. I. (1979). Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice. McGraw-Hill.
Holmes, B. (1965). Problems in education: A comparative approach. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ibrahim, M. (2020). Psikologi Pendidikan: Suatu Stimulus Awal. In M. dan I. Rumalean (Ed.), Forsiladi Pers (Vol. 7, Issue 2). https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=WT-HEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR2&ots=orOGoJ4XaM&sig=_RldS7mWG5ZSpRE8sRmGX1Kt2Hs&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Lauglo, J. (1997). Concepts of the life-long and life-wide learning. In J. Lauglo (Ed.), Reforming education for work: A cognitive vocational approach (pp. 11-32). Universtitetsforlaget.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (1998). Understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Ministry of National Education. (2018). Curriculum reform in Turkey. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/
Montessori, M. (1912). The Montessori method. Frederick A. Stokes Company.Ibrahim, M. (2020). Psikologi Pendidikan: Suatu Stimulus Awal. In M. dan I. Rumalean (Ed.), Forsiladi Pers (Vol. 7, Issue 2). https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=WT-HEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR2&ots=orOGoJ4XaM&sig=_RldS7mWG5ZSpRE8sRmGX1Kt2Hs&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Muhsyanur. (n.d.). Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran Menulis Karangan Persuasi melalui Penggunaan Media Iklan Layanan Masyarakat pada Siswa Kelas X-2 SMA Negeri 1 Takkalalla Kabupaten Wajo.
Noddings, N. (2003). Happiness and education. Cambridge University Press.
OECD. (n.d.). PISA. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2014). Cross-national policy borrowing: Understanding reception and translation. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(2), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2013.875649
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. Heinemann.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. The University of Chicago Press.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Akser Aydin, Erden Farhat Abdel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.