Improving Students’ Scientific Literacy Through Inquiry-Based Biology Learning in German Secondary Schools

Authors

  • Lukas Meyer Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany
  • Anna Fischer Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany
  • Thomas Becker Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany

Keywords:

scientific literacy, inquiry-based learning, biology education, secondary schools, Germany

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of inquiry-based learning approaches for enhancing scientific literacy among secondary school students in Germany, addressing concerns about declining science competencies and engagement documented in international assessments. Employing a mixed-methods quasi-experimental design, the research involved 360 students from nine Gymnasium schools across three German states, with experimental groups experiencing structured inquiry-based biology instruction while control groups received traditional content-focused teaching over one academic year. Scientific literacy was assessed using adapted PISA science literacy frameworks measuring competencies in explaining phenomena scientifically, evaluating and designing scientific inquiry, and interpreting data and evidence critically. Results demonstrate that inquiry-based approaches produced significantly higher gains in scientific literacy competencies compared to traditional instruction, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to large across literacy dimensions. Students in inquiry-based classrooms showed particular improvements in experimental design, evidence evaluation, and applying biological knowledge to real-world contexts. However, implementation challenges emerged including teacher preparation needs, curriculum coverage pressures, and assessment alignment difficulties. This research provides empirical support for inquiry-based biology education while illuminating contextual factors influencing implementation success in German educational settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206

Krajcik, J. S., & Mun, K. (2014). Promises and challenges of using learning technologies to promote student learning of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 337–360). Routledge.

Kartini and Muhsyanur. (2025). The Importance of Knowing Curriculum for Teacher : A Phenomenological Study in Indonesia. International Proceeding of Innovativescienceand Transdisciplinary Studies, 6(1), 127–137. https://ipistrans.lppmi.or.id/index.php/proceeding/article/view/16/16

Muhsyanur, M. (2024a). Implementation of Merdeka Belajar in Indonesian Language Learning in Senior High Schools. Jurnal Ilmiah Insan Mulia, 1(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.59923/jiim.v1i1.170

Muhsyanur, M. (2024b). Love-Based Curriculum as a New Paradigm in Language Education : Between Cognition , Affection , and Spirituality. 2(5), 12–19.

Muhsyanur Muhsyanur, S. S. (2024). Implementation of Madrasah Literacy Program to Enhance Language Competence of Female Students at MTs As’ adiyah Putri Pusat Sengkang, Indonesia. Global Society and Knowledge Review, 2(6), 69–81.

Muhsyanur, Rahmatullah, A. S., Misnawati, Dumiyati, & Ghufron, S. (2021). The Effectiveness of “Facebook” As Indonesian Language Learning Media for Elementary School Student: Distance Learning Solutions in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Multicultural Education, 7(04), 38–47. https://www.mccaddogap.com/ojs/index.php/me/article/view/8%0Ahttps://www.mccaddogap.com/ojs/index.php/me/article/download/8/10

Mulyana, Y., Akbar, Z., Zainal, H., Jiwantara, F. A., Muhsyanur, Yusriadi, Y., & Bin-Tahir, S. Z. (2021). High domestic violence during the pandemic COVID-19. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 6283–6290. https://doi.org/10.46254/an11.20211059

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Prenzel, M., Reinhold, P., Schöps, K., & Rönnebeck, S. (2019). PISA 2018: Grundbildung im internationalen Vergleich. Waxmann.

Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. European Commission.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Meyer, L., Fischer, A., & Becker, T. (2025). Improving Students’ Scientific Literacy Through Inquiry-Based Biology Learning in German Secondary Schools. TRICKS : Journal of Education and Learning Practices, 3(7), 1–11. Retrieved from https://journal.echaprogres.or.id/index.php/tricks/article/view/71